Speed dating gladstone qld
Evidence - admissibility of admissions made off-video during interview with accused - whether reasonable excuse for not videotaping admissions - Criminal Code (WA), s.570D(2)(b), (4) - admissibility of evidence of prior inconsistent statement of witness - whether evidence of statement went to issue - whether admissible as exception to rule against admission of collateral statements - whether exceptions of bias, interest or corruption applicable - whether the detail of alleged statement indicating an exception to the collateral evidence rule must be put specifically to the witness in cross-examination - whether evidence of prior inconsistent statement hearsay - whether exception to hearsay rule - jury directions - whether trial judge's direction accorded with Mc Kinneyv The Queen - appropriateness of reference to possible perjury on part of police. WILLIAMS, Luke Sheridan - CCA, 9.2.2005Sully, Hidden & Howie JJCitation: R v Williams  NSWCCA 14Sentence appeal.Maliciously inflict GBH with intent to inflict GBH.3y with NPP of 18m.Whether sentence excessive - whether sufficient weight given to appellant's youth - parity. Sentence appeal allowed: resentenced to 20y with NPP of 16y.
As a result of the impact, GBH was caused to the female passenger sitting in the front seat.
Aged 32 at time of sentencing - remorse - psychotic illness - auditory hallucinations - drug abuse - intended to continue experimenting with drugs - no priors.
Whether error in sentencing judge's assessment of evidence relating to applicant's mental & psychiatric condition at time of offence - whether error in assessment of culpability - whether sentence excessive. SMITH, Adam Eric - CCA, 9.2.2005Grove & James JJCitation: R v Smith  NSWCCA 19Sentence appeal. Applicant was driving his vehicle on a rural road when he overtook another vehicle after entering a 100kph zone.
PHAM, Bao Ngoc - CCA, 4.2.2005Sully, Dunford & Hidden JJCitation: R v Pham  NSWCCA 9Conviction and sentence appeal. Deceased was a wholesale drug dealer, described as being a mid-range distributor of heroin.
The appellant was a retail distributor & was assisted by 3 or 4 other persons.